The ways in which Julian should respond to Elias who is<em> not practising safety </em>when playing football are:
- A. Remind Elias about the dangers of concussions and the consequences of serious injury.
- D. Remind Elias how he missed games last year and did not like the way he felt being on the sidelines.
Based on the complete question, we can see that Elias missed games last year<em> due to injuries</em> and did not like being sidelined and now he is not fully recovered and is about to get himself injured again.
With this in mind, it is important for him to remind him about the dangers of concussions and how he missed games last year due to injuries so that he would better practice safety measures.
Therefore, the correct answers are options A and D
Read more about safety measures here:
brainly.com/question/9314352
Answer:
The secondary source
Explanation:
When you cite and review literature in a research paper you can only cite sources you directly had contact with, this means, you, as a researcher, had first-hand contact with.
Remember that primary sources refer to sources that obtained the data directly from the population while secondary sources refer to sources that didn't obtained data directly from them.
<u>No matter what kind of source we're talking about, when citing literature in a paper you can only cite the ones YOU had contact with. </u>
This student reads an important secondary source that refers to a primary source, however, <u>since the primary source is not available online or publicly, the student doesn't have direct access to it</u>.
Therefore, <u>the student cannot cite the primary source and will cite and describe the secondary one when reviewing the literature on this topic in a research paper. </u>
Connotative. It is a different shade of meaning for both of them.
Here I found this in my pictures for some reason. I must’ve needed it too
This is false that A test that gives comparable scores when it is administered to the same individual a few days apart is unreliable.
A test is unreliable if it produces similar results when it is given to the same person several days apart. A test's or another selection procedure's reliability refers to what it measures and how well it assesses it. If a measure's dependability is poor, it will be difficult for you to believe that the results accurately reflect the participant's performance and are not merely the result of methodological, psychological, or environmental factors.
Reliability is a qualitative judgment in this case, analogous to accuracy and stability, but unreliability is a quantitative one. I believe that the definition of measurement results in unreliability provided it needs to be revised because it does not accurately reveal the content.
To know more about unreliability refer to: brainly.com/question/1245796
#SPJ4
