Answer:
Qué le preguntas a mi amigo?
Explanation:
Answer:I feel like it is a
Explanation:
Answer:
dahl sets up the readers by giving them candy
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
They had no proof whatsoever!
Explanation:
The problem is that, if the american teachers thought they saw that specific painting, and the person who later offered the police officers fruit, and acted surprised, could've hid the painting before the police got here. What the teachers could've done is take a picture and have proof for when the cops did get there. If they didn't have a phone, they should've kept their eye on the painting, someway or another.
HOPE THIS HELPS!! (:
Do you mean The American Revolution? If thats the case, the arguments in favor it Britain is that they have the the strongest navy, so without the help of the French (including Lafayfette) they couldn’t stand a chance, and the king(King George III) tried to pay the debt, and prevented the colonists (Americans) from going to the other side, so they don’t have to get into a fight with the natives. As for against, King George took too much control, and even made a declaratory law that he could control what happens in the colonies, and that the colonists would have very little power. He was also taxing them, but they were poor, so they rebelled against him. Sorry if I wrote a book. Also, I hope it helps you!