If a citizen votes for a Republican for president and a Democrat for senator, he or she has engaged in split-ticket voting.
<h3><u>What is meant by a split-ticket vote?</u></h3>
Split-ticket voting, in contrast to straight-ticket voting, in which a voter selects candidates from the same political party for each post up for election, is the practice of voting for candidates in an election from various political parties when more than one office is at stake. Split-ticket voting is possible in various mixed-member systems that permit it, including mixed-member proportional and parallel voting systems.
Learn more about the split-ticket vote with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/3857947?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
A falacy masquerading as a valid inference
Explanation:
Assume that the premise(s) of the following argument are true. Apply the other three tests of the worthiness of an argument in their proper order: "We've lost six games in a row; our luck is probably going to change today." That argument is an example of A falacy masquerading as a valid inference
Answer:Make eye contact with Eric and signal him to stop.
Explanation:
This is the best way to act without disrupting the flow of the lesson and without singling out the student and making them feel like they are put on the spotlight which may cause them to retreat negatively making the situation worse.
Sometimes when you call out a name of a student and tell them to quite down they may feel like they are being put on the spotlight and may not react well to that which may disrupt your whole lesson trying to bring back the students to focus again.
Answer:
If General James Longstreet had commanded the Confederate forces at Gettysburg instead of Lee the Confederacy might very well have won the Civil War.
The outcome of a Confederate victory would have been the break up of the United States but not quite as President Jeff Davis wanted. The Confederacy was never a country, which is obvious from its name. The Southern states were allied by expediency but were as disparate among each other as they were with the North. It is difficult to see how they would have formed an alternative long term Confederate States.
The Confederacy could not have occupied the North and had no intention to do so. The invasion of the North by the Army of Northern Virginia was tactical, not strategic and the Southern Government's intention was to sue for peace based on a rather naive idea that capturing Washington would have ended the war.
If they had captured Lincoln and his government that might have happened, more likely though they would have decamped to another major Northern city before the Army of Northern Virginia got there.
Great question, I was looking forward to a debate on the Civil War!
Explanation:
