Answer:
The answer is b. is a tying arrangement that may be a violation of federal antitrust law.
Explanation:
If Universal Syndication has told television stations and networks that they cannot have the rights to play program (“Friends” rerun), unless they also agree to take packages (i.e., typing of other packages), even though the television stations and networks complain that the packages do not draw viewers ,then Universal Syndication’s requirement for tying (or bundling) might be a violation of federal antitrust law because it (Universal Syndication) could be using monopoly power in one television market as an influence to control competition, and strengthen its monopoly power in another market.
Answer:
B.London is the right answer
George Washington did, in fact, have a political interest in Virginia. Prior to the US Capital being in Maryland, it was stationed in Virginia, close to Washington's home town.
I don't know if this is what you were asking but I hope it helped :/
Answer:
B. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison can be regarded as an icon that helps to give more strength to the federal judiciary through the establishment of power of judicial review, these is a medium whereby there could be declaration of
legislation by federal courts as along with executive as well with administrative actions and the inconsistent that is associated with the U.S. Constitution and therefore null and void.This judicial review which was supreme Court case, can be regarded as one that was strengthen in 1803 by
Marbury vs Madison, this can be explained as how the courts are been given power so they can make law as well as other amendments which are regarded as been on violation of United States constitution
