1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stepladder [879]
2 years ago
15

Jason rowed 1/3 of a mile down the river.Jane rowed 2/6 of a mile down the river. Jude rowed 2/9 of a mile down the river.What i

s the total distance that jason Jane jude rowed down the river in total?
Mathematics
1 answer:
seraphim [82]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

8 / 9 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Jason's distance = 1/3 mile

Jane's distance = 2/6 miles

Jude's distance = 2/9 miles

The total miles rowed down the river by all 3 :

(1/3 + 2/6 + 2/9) miles

The L. C. M of the denominator (3, 6, 9) = 18

(6 + 6 + 4) / 18

16 / 18 miles

8 / 9 miles

You might be interested in
Can someone help me with this real quick?​
valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

11. A) 6x = 13

Step-by-step explanation:

11. Subtract 10 from both sides to make it equal 6x=13

12. For #12... None of the answers seem right? If you distribute and subtract, it should be

-4x + 44 = 66 then

-4x = 22...

Sorry if this didn’t help much, I know that 11 is right though ;)

6 0
3 years ago
Please help ASAP, giving brainliest!
scoundrel [369]

Answer:no

Step-by-step explanation:

Because you have two -2 in the x slots , if you see an number more than once it is no longer a function.

7 0
3 years ago
Sara and her dad visit Yo-Yo Yogurt again. This time, the scale says that sara has 14 ounces of vanilla yogurt in her cup. Her f
enot [183]

1.5/16 its the most i can do

5 0
3 years ago
It is not possible to prove one pair of triangles congruent and then use their congruent corresponding parts to prove another pa
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

true

The wording does not quite mean anything,

but what I think was meant to ask is

"if we use some parts of two triangles to prove they are congruent,

can we then use that to prove that

a pair of corresponding parts not used before are congruent?"

The answer is

Yes, of course,

Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent,

which teachers usually abbreviate as CPCTC.

For example, if we find that

side AB is congruent with side DE,

side BC is congruent with side EF, and

angle ABC is congruent with angle DEF,

we can prove that triangles ABC and DEF are congruent

by Side-Angle-Side (SAS) congruence.

We then, by CPCTC, can conclude that other pairs of corresponding parts are congruent:

side AB is congruent with side DE,

angle BCA is congruent with angle EFD, and

angle CAB is congruent with angle FDE.

It was possible (by CPCTC) to prove those last 3 congruence statements,

after proving the triangles congruent.

The expected answer is FALSE.

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which expression is equivalent to the expression (7×2)^7​
ddd [48]

Answer:

9^7

Step-by-step explanation:

7*2=9

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The directex of Y=1/8x^2 is?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the value of v? 45(v−7)=2
    13·2 answers
  • Some please explain and help really stuck
    11·2 answers
  • What is the length of a piece of cloth that is 5 centimeters wide an area of 20 cm^2?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the value of the expression 3 divided by 4/5?
    11·2 answers
  • What is a rule for the sequence below ? 1.8,2.85,3.90,4.95,6
    10·2 answers
  • What is the term that is used for the only number which is neither positive nor negative.
    6·1 answer
  • The tables below show four sets of data:
    13·1 answer
  • Can I have help with this please?
    12·1 answer
  • Compare the numerical expressions.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!