Answer:
The answer is Strict scrutiny
Explanation:
Strict scrutiny is a form of judicial review that a courts use to determine the constitutionality of certain laws. ... To pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest," and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.
Answer:
a. the caring principle.
Explanation:
The three principles of ethical decision described by Krogstand and Robertson are the: utilitarian principle, imperative principle and generalization principle.
Utilitarian principle: this principle emphasizes that decision should be make based on consequences of action. Hence decision should be made to favor the greatest number.
Imperative principle:This principle emphasizes that a decision maker should make decision based on laid down rules.
Generalization principle: This principle emphasizes that decisions should be made putting in consideration everyone.
He was also the patron saint of Happy Marriages, the plague, and epilepsy
Answer:
Qualified Health Claim
Explanation:
A Qualified Health Claim is a claim that is permitted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which is supported by scientific evidence as regards a food substance and its relationship to a disease.
A qualified health claim is usually based on few evidences compared to authorized health claim. For example, when a new or emerging evidence of a food in relation to its ability to reduce the risk of a particular disease is found, but not concrete enough for the FDA to approve an Authorized Heath claim, the FDA then issues a Qualified Health Claim.
Therefore, in the case of selenium, the FDA approved a Qualified Health Claim.
