1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
balu736 [363]
3 years ago
13

办理教留服学位学历认证Q/微29304199 英国圣安德鲁斯St Andrews毕业证文凭学位证书offer操办罗切斯特留信认证成绩单

History
2 answers:
Serhud [2]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

couldn't get your language.......I advice u that just ask questions in english!!!

Lana71 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

mmm

Explanation:

points.

You might be interested in
The size of a family does not depend on?
Goryan [66]
Education because in some religions birth control is forbidden, in some countries you are only allowed one child, and in some cultures like american culture the ideal number of children would be 2-4 children
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was the most significant legacy of the Anti Federalists? * The necessary and proper clause O The Bill of
madreJ [45]

Answer:the new nation

Those who did not support the Constitution came to be known as Anti-Federalists or ‘states-rights men’ and their most notable representative was Patrick Henry (who had refused to attend the Convention because of his suspicion of it, declaring “I smell a rat, tending toward monarchy”). Others included George Clinton, Richard Henry Lee and Mercy Otis Warren, the female chronicler. Thomas Jefferson was also sharply critical of the Constitution, though he actively supported some parts of it, and later explained that he was not fully Anti-Federalist but somewhere between the two positions.

As a group, Anti-Federalists were concerned about several issues. They feared that sovereignty, autonomy and states’ rights would be trampled by the newly-empowered national government. They argued that over time the power and influence of the states would be eroded or ‘drained’ by the federal government. They worried that the centralisation of power would put control into the hands of an urban-based elite. They expressed concern that the president, with control of the army, might become a military dictator (“[the presidency] would be a foetus of monarchy!” said Edmund Randolph). They feared the separation of powers in the Constitution was not strong enough or distinct enough. They panicked about the possible implications for personal liberties like freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and the right to worship freely, which to many Americans had been the real driving issue behind the revolution.

A historian’s view:

“The basic concept stressed [in many anti-Federalist works] was the evil effect of power. ‘The love of power is natural… it is insatiable…’ wrote Burgh. ‘Power renders men wanton, insolent to others and fond of themselves,’ observed Gordon and Trenchard… This mistrust of power was characteristic of American political thought during this period.”

Unlike their opposition, the Anti-Federalists did not engage in a coordinated and sustained propaganda barrage. While the Federalist Papers appeared as 85 single editions, published regularly and with clear arguments and tone, the Anti-Federalists wrote sporadically, using pseudonyms such as Cato, Federal Farmer, Centinel and Brutus. The quality of their pamphlets did not approach those of the Federalists. Intellectually outgunned and lacking a figurehead leader such as Washington, the Anti-Federalists were not able to convince enough of their cause, though they enjoyed plenty of support, particularly in the larger states and in the south. Some Americans saw the flaws in both sides and supported neither the federalist or anti-federalist points-of-view. The picture above, The Looking Glass for 1787: A House Divided against itself cannot Stand, shows the two camps pulling the state of Connecticut apart with their constant bickering and equivocation.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ME WITH THIS ITS CIVICS. How are written opinions used by lower courts?
Evgesh-ka [11]
The ability to retry cases of lower courts is Appellate Jurisdiction. But for a same level court to re-open and examine a case is Secondary Jurisdiction.
7 0
4 years ago
Which of the following statements about China before the 1800s is true?
frutty [35]

Answer:

the answer is a

Explanation:

i literally just did it three seconds ago

3 0
4 years ago
Did Sanford D. Pole and other American planters have the right to stage a revolt in Hawaii in 1983 ?
Lorico [155]
No they did not bcuz they weren’t doing good
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write a letter to a friend that explains why the cherokee leader john ross took his people's case to the supreme court.
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement describes Karol Jozef Wojtyla? (Points : 3) Russian novelist and dissident who was exiled for writing about oppr
    14·1 answer
  • Question 4
    10·1 answer
  • Which major event most contributed to the spread of buddhism
    12·2 answers
  • What was the Dawes Act?
    6·2 answers
  • Which option best completes the diagram? Apex
    9·2 answers
  • An article 26–2 of the United Nations Universal declaration what subjects and books address the goal?
    13·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete the statements.
    6·2 answers
  • Read each sentence. Choose the best answers from the drop-down menus.
    10·1 answer
  • Read these sentences from a concluding paragraph.
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!