Answer:
Explanation:
ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
Answer:
Maya will lose her ability to use proper grammar and Julio will lose his ability to understand language.
Explanation:
Brocca and Wernicks both area deals in language but have little differences in both areas. These differences help us in understanding both areas. The Brocca area is found in the frontal lobe. The Brocca area work in the motor area of speech production. It helps the body in movement which helps in the area of speech production. If some problem occurs in this area then the patient can understand speech but could not produce speech.
This is Brocca aphasia. On the other hand, the Wenicks area is located in the parietal and temporal lobe. It is a sensory area. This area helps us to understand the speech gives it a proper meaning. When a problem occurs in this area, the patient can produce the speech but not able to understand the language of others. Thus here Maya Suffering from the ability to use proper grammar and Julio loses the ability to understand language.
Answer:Goal-Setting Theory
Explanation:
Locke's Goal-Setting Theory explains the important link between goals and performance which increases workplace motivation.He demonstrated that for effective performances in the workplace, employees should be motivated by clear, defined, challenging goals with supporting feedback which are a vital process for achieving success.
Answer:The Revolution also unleashed powerful political, social, and economic forces that would transform the post-Revolution politics and society, including increased participation in politics and governance, the legal institutionalization of religious toleration, and the growth and diffusion of the population.
Hello. Your question is incomplete and this makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, in the context of your question, we can assume that you are referring to John Marshall's decision regarding the Marbury v. Madison. If that is the case, I hope the answer below can help you.
Answer and Explanation:
In the case of Marbury v. Madison, John Marshall decided that the national congress does not have absolute power over government decisions, as, like the entire political body in the country, it was subject to the laws covered by the federal constitution. Thus, any act, adopted by Congress, or any other branch of government, that was unconstitutional, that is, that was not approved by any law within the federal constitution, could be revised or completely annulled by the Supreme Court.
What prompted Marshall to decide this was the positioning of the federal constitution as the country's supreme law, which cannot be violated in any way.
The Marbury case v. Madison, occurred when William Marbury, who was appointed as country judge by President John Adams, did not receive the diploma that allowed him to hold office, when James Madison became Secretary of State after President Thomas Jefferson came to power. However, as an appointed judge, Marbury had the right to receive the diploma and Marshall saw the denial of the diploma as an unconstitutional act.