Answer:
The answer is A) Dominant-strategy equilibrium is special case of pure-strategy Nash equilibrium.
Explanation:
The relationship between a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium and a dominant-strategy equilibrium is that dominant-strategy equilibrium is special case of pure-strategy Nash equilibrium because each type of game has a Nash equilibrium with a mixture of strategies, of which dominant-strategy could either be inclusive, or not inclusive.
Explanation:
It is not important only for what we speak but is important to what we write and how to say it. To communicate well this is only not enough to have well-organized ideas expressed concretely and coherently. One must also think about the style tone and clarity of his/her ideas and adapt these elements to read in public. To choose the effective language, the writer must be considered the objective of the documents
<u>Characteristics of an effective language:
</u>
- Concrete and specific not wide and vague.
- Concrete not verbose
- Familiar, not obscure
- Precise and clear not inaccurate and ambiguous
- Constructive, not destructive
- Appropriately formal.
Answer:
We have to answer if the response choices to this question are:
a) Open-ended
b) Scale
c) Contingent
d) Fixed
And the correct answer is:
b) Scale
Explanation:
The response choices are of scale-type because they represent a gradient (or a scale).
They are meant to express the level of unsafety that the elderly experience in their neighborhood, and go, from the highest point the scale (a great deal), to the lowest point in the scale (none), with two options in the middle acting acting as a bridge between the two extremes (Some, Not too much).
