Answer:
I think it would be rhetorical appeals. I think this because as you read a book you want something to try to figure out and that is what a rhetorical appeal does. It makes an argument more persuasive than that of an argument that had no rhetorical appeals.
Explanation:
Answer:
They weren't treated like humans, but more as a commodity, something that can be used and abused without care. In the North, people were against slavery and working to end it, so naturally, you'd go somewhere safer, where you're actually seen as a human being with feelings and unalienable rights.
<span>For the answer to the question above, it is A stronger central government was necessary to maintain order. It is a </span><span>convention that drew up the </span>Constitution of the United States<span>. Stimulated by severe economic troubles, which produced radical political movements such as </span>Shays<span>’s Rebellion, and urged on by a demand for a stronger central government, the convention met in the Pennsylvania State House in </span>Philadelphia.
What was that "wrong idea"? What is the impact of the nuance of the word "handled" in the following excerpt: "I was immediately handled and tossed up to see if I were sound by some of the crew"? It shows the Africans were viewed as objects instead of human beings.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "to describe why city and state government officials made certain decisions." the statement that best describes Steffens' purpose in writing about government is that <span>to describe why city and state government officials made certain decisions</span>