The equations is wrong because on the left hand side, you can combine like terms so in total you get 4n+2=5n-2. you can see this equation is wrong. you need the left side to equal to the right, so you can make it 5n-2=5n-2
Only raul has correctly identified a base and corresponding height..... the remaining haven't.....
in the case of mark he's incorrect because any side can be the base but what matters is that the base must always be perpendicular to the height
in kiki's case... she's wrong because what she identified is the slant height... not height
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
All of them are yes because you either subtract or add to put in the form of mx+b
To evaluate the radius of the cone we proceed as follows:
V=1/3 πr²h
plugging in the values, v=88π, h=8 ft
step 1
88π1/3πr²(8)
step 2
88π=8/3πr²
step 3
divide both sides by π
88=8/3r²
multiply both sides by 3/(8)
88(3/8)=r²
step 4
simplify
33=r²
step 5
get the square root
r=√33
Thus the mistake that Fatima made was:
<span> In step 3, Fatima did not multiply 88 by the reciprocal of 8/3 </span>
