Answer:
Antifederalists argued that in a state of nature people were entirely free. In society some rights were yielded for the common good. But, there were some rights so fundamental that to give them up would be contrary to the common good. These rights, which should always be retained by the people, needed to be explicitly stated in a bill of rights that would clearly define the limits of government. A bill of rights would serve as a fire bell for the people, enabling them to immediately know when their rights were threatened.
Additionally, some Antifederalists argued that the protections of a bill of rights was especially important under the Constitution, which was an original compact with the people. State bills of rights offered no protection from oppressive acts of the federal government because the Constitution, treaties and laws made in pursuance of the Constitution were declared to be the supreme law of the land. Antifederalists argued that a bill of rights was necessary because, the supremacy clause in combination with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses would allow implied powers that could endanger rights.
Explanation: i hope this helps some
Jackson is talking to the american citizens and christian community and arguing that the indians should be removed and argued that if this happened Americans would be free to travel west, and America would gain territory. These ideas were part of the american manifest of destiny to move west and spread democracy and americn values. He gave the speech during the state of the union or annual address and he loathed the indians to a point he wanted to kill them all.
because of the gas that the bomb produced, many women gave birth to offspring with birth defects. and because the bomb hit two very populated cities, many died when the bomb was dropped. those who survived, inhaled the polluted air and had problems breathing.
Answer:
It provided goods to every continent.
