Answer:
The national hero, the initiator of the accession of the Spanish Florida, Andrew Jackson (1767–1845) led the country at 62, but the age did not prevent him from showing himself as one of the most active presidents in history. For authoritarian manners, the active use of the veto, and shaking up the entire government mechanism in order to appoint loyal supporters to key posts, Jackson earned the people the nickname "King Andrew." However, this did not prevent him from being reelected in 1832 for a second term and becoming a real symbol of the era of classical American democracy (which is often called “Jacksonian”).
Among the events of the Jackson administration, two episodes deserve attention, when the strengthening of presidential power played a key role in determining the course of the country's further development. The first episode is related to an attempt by South Carolina to refuse to comply with federal laws on import trade duties. Southern cotton producers did not like the policy of industrial protectionism pursued by the federal center in the interests of the northern and western states, and the southerners, led by Jackson's first vice president John Calhoun, decided in 1832 to oppose protectionism to the so-called "The doctrine of nullification." President Jackson’s reaction was instantaneous: US Army units were sent to South Carolina, and only the intervention of the “master of compromises,” Henry Clay, helped to avoid a civil war. South Carolina was content with promises of a gradual reduction in fees and repealed its nullification laws.
If in the case of the Carolina revolt, Jackson acted contrary to his own ideology (he was an opponent of the increase in duties), on the basis of authoritarian approaches, then in another famous episode, the president exercised not only his power, but also his aspirations. It is about the elimination of the National Bank of the United States, the famous brainchild of Alexander Hamilton. In 1833, Jackson withdrew federal funds from the bank’s accounts, thereby inflicting a blow, as he believed, on the east coast elite, “dragging a financial noose around the neck of the American people.” Supporters of the president were delighted, but in the long run the decision had many negative consequences: the financial sector for many decades got out of direct government control.
Explanation:
MPs
The main reason it took so long to abolish the slave trade was simply because the pro-slave trade lobby had too many important and powerful figures in the establishment. The plantation owners, the merchants and those living in Britain, some of them MP’s, were well organised, as well as being powerful and wealthy enough to bribe other MPs to support them.
Prime Minister William Pitt
William Pitt talks to the House of Commons about the French Declaration of Wars
William Pitt talks to the House of Commons about the French Declaration of Wars
The Prime Minister William Pitt had been a supporter of abolition, but the war with France changed his views. During the war he did not want to upset the cabinet ministers that were mostly against abolition. Therefore he withdrew his support for the abolitionists. Additionally the events in St Domingue convinced Pitt that to abolish slavery would be a disaster.
King George III
King George III was against the abolition movement, as was his son, the Duke of Clarence. Support for abolition in Parliament was now restricted to the committed few.
1806 Change of government
The new Prime Minister, Lord Grenville actively promoted fellow abolitionists to cabinet. More MPs had committed themselves to abolition during the 1805 election campaign.
1806 Parliamentary Bill
Poster advertising a meeting about abolishing slavery
The Foreign Slave Trade Abolition Bill of 1806 represented a change of strategy. Rather than have Wilberforce represent yet another straightforward abolition bill, the parliamentary abolitionists secretly agreed to pretend to 'ignore' a Foreign Slave Trade Abolition Bill, which was instead sold as an anti-French measure to the House of Commons.
The Bill was designed to prevent British merchants from importing slaves into the territories of foreign powers.
It was only on the third reading of the Bill, that the pro-slavery lobby realised what was really at stake behind the Bill. It would have been difficult to oppose it because the Government presented it as a way to win the Napoleonic war.
Answer:
Explanation:Ancestors of the Wichita and their allies, the Tawakoni and Waco, have resided on the southern plains since precontact times. The Southern Plains Village archaeological tradition was well established by A.D. 800, and the villages of these early horticulturalists and hunters were located from south central Kansas to northern Texas throughout the historic period. During the eighteenth century the Kichai, once a member of the Caddoan Confederacy, joined the allied tribes who were assigned to a reservation in Indian Territory in 1859. The Wichita remained in their ancestral homeland. Contemporary Wichita, Tawakoni, Waco, and Kichai are organized as the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes, a federally recognized tribe with headquarters at Anadarko, Oklahoma.
