The answer to this question is explained below.
Explanation:
There are two parts in this question. One is the possible heuristics when deciding whether you should study hard for the test, and secondly when ask someone for a date, or accept a date.
Studying hard for the test:
In deciding whether study hard for the test, you should consider the following heuristics:
- Think of your previous experience about studying and see if it worked for you.
- If it worked for you, go for it.
- If it did not work for you, try a better solution this time.
Asking someone for date(or vice versa):
In deciding whether to go on a date with someone, the following heuristics should be kept in mind:
- Think that what you know about the person you are asked or being asked about the date
- Know what your own limits are
- Make sure you know the person well before asking for a date.
Learn more about heuristics at:
brainly.com/question/2933570
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: No, because the killing by the policeman was justifiable
Explanation:
The woman has no part that much to play in the murder of the man, because asides the man being shut outside there was a probability he would have equally be shut inside too if met by the police officer there, the killing by the police officer was justifiable as the man was caught in the act and could possibly have shut the police officer too.
Answer: Continuous Innovation
Explanation:
Continuous Innovation refers to the making of New products that are modifications of existing products that require NO CHANGE in the way the product was used in the past.
In other words, NO NEW user learning is required.
Examples include line extensions and improved products such as the iPhone 6+.
Answer:
1dopamine; 2 increased
She's kinda a nut job right!?
Explanation:
Good luck
It was between Mexico and Texas
