Everyone has one, and it seems as if everyone is talking on one. Cell phones are a part of modern life. Along with the phones co
me the towers to relay their signals. Within the last decade more than 140,000 cell towers have been erected in the United States. Still more will be needed to eliminate “dead spots,” places where cell phones don’t pick up signals. Communities are divided on cell tower construction. While many want better service and coverage, towers are not welcome in their backyards. Issues of skyline aesthetics and safety are reflected in the growing number of lawsuits that result from numerous towers being built. Is the answer to improved cell phone coverage to build more towers or to build fewer towers with greater efficiency? Our skylines will improve, and safety issues will be minimized. Who will answer this call with responsible action? 1. What is the writer’s claim in this argument?
2. What is one piece of evidence that supports the claim?
3. Is the argument well-constructed, in your opinion? Explain.
1) There's an issue with the safety and aesthetic appeal of cell towers.
2) "Still more will be needed to eliminate "dead spots," places where cell phones don't pick up signals."
3) No, the author's argument isn't well constructed because in my opinion because they asked questions more than stating what they thought/their opinion. Instead, they should've stated their claim then have given evidence and explanations to their evidence like a good quality paragraph.
The author´s primary purpose is to compel readers or audiences to take action, convince them an idea through an argument, or to confirm their belief´s.
