Answer:
Our lives would be ENTIRELY different. "The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This shows that different religions would be unacceptable and freedom of speech wouldnt really be there. Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Answer:
Impact. Rather than helping them as its creators intended, the Dawes Act had decidedly negative effects on Native Americans. It ended their tradition of farming communally held land which had for centuries ensured them a home and individual identity in the tribal community.
Government Records on voting history and offices held because that is the most likely to be objective instead of biased. A commentators views would be biased. Campaign literature is subjective and could be biased as well. Neighbors and government workers are no source at all because they would be subjective and biased.
Answer:
i think it was the spanish
<span>They were unwilling to invest the needed funds into industries</span>
