<span>Madison claimed that private rights and public good would be best protected in a single large republic rather than a mélange of small republics. Do I agree? Yes, absolutely, I agree. There's no strength in division; it is pretty obvious that in unity is strength. Just think for a seconds what will become of the United States if there are 52 countries in North America? India would be more developed had Pakistan and Bangladesh not broken off from India. Yes, public good should be protected in a large republic rather than a string of small republics.</span>
He had recently captured France
The United States uses foreign aid as a tool of foreign policy because aid can be deployed as a means of influencing nations to align their values with those of the United States. An example of such values is democracy. The United States also uses aid to promote development and to facilitate recovery in the wake of disasters.
The passage shows that Californian politics, and in particular, political advancement methods, were not wholly bound by law as they are now.
Governmental institutions and government control was weaker at that time, so it was difficult to enforce the law consistently. Because of it, people did not have a strong commitment to following legal paths for advancement. Revolutions and rebellions were more effective in seizing power than political campaigns, and there were few negative repercussions for those who chose that method.
Explanation:
Difference between them are: Orogeny is a mountain building process while epeirogeny is a continent building process. ... In orogeny the rock masses move in tangential direction to the earth's surface while in epeirogeny the rock masses move in radial or vertical direction to the earth's surface.