Answer:
C. Providing artists with discarded materials for their artwork.
Explanation:
<u>Answer:
</u>
The headline is an example of the conflict caused by states administering elections while federal law protects voting rights.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Different states have different requirements for the voters to be eligible for voting, but the federal laws unequivocally grant voting rights to everyone above eighteen years of age.
- The conduct and operations of elections are in the hands of the executive, but they do not have the right to modify the rules set for the conduct of elections by the United States Constitution.
- This disparity gives rise to conflict between the state machineries and federal laws.
It means that if you school requires CLEP scores of 50 or higher on the College Mathematics CLEP then you will receive the same credit if you score a 50, 51, 65 or 72. It will appear on your transcript as a "pass" - it won't affect your GPA.
Answer:
Commercial treaties are economic agree- ments between two or more countries to trade with each other on favorable terms. The Senate must approve all treaties by a two-thirds vote.
Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>
