1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mila [183]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following was the u.s government allowed to do under the articles of confederation

History
1 answer:
lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
3 0

The Articles of Confederation created a national government composed of a Congress, which had the power to declare war, appoint military officers, sign treaties, make alliances, appoint foreign ambassadors, and manage relations with Indians.

You might be interested in
Which of the following accurately describes the relationship of Islam to the Byzantine and Persian Empires?
Crank

The relationship of Islam to the Byzantine and Persian Empires was that Islam never gained acceptance in Byzantine and Persian territory.

<h3>Which relationship is between Byzantine and Persian Empire?</h3>

There was a friendly relations with Byzantium by the Persian Empire which meant peace and prosperity for the Christians of Persia.

Because of this relationship of Islam to the Byzantine and Persian Empires was that Islam never gained acceptance in Byzantine and Persian territory.

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about Islam

<em>brainly.com/question/1214743</em>

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
How many siblings did Galileo Galilei have ?
jok3333 [9.3K]


He did not have any siblings.

Hope This Helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements about a democratic state are true
xz_007 [3.2K]
I think the answers are A and D. Good luck I hope this helped.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the verdict handed down on John Scopes?
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

In Dayton, Tennessee, the so-called Scopes Monkey Trial begins with John Thomas Scopes, a young high school science teacher, accused of teaching evolution in violation of a Tennessee state law.

The law, which had been passed in March, made it a misdemeanor punishable by fine to “teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals.” With local businessman George Rappleyea, Scopes had conspired to get charged with this violation, and after his arrest the pair enlisted the aid of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to organize a defense. Hearing of this coordinated attack on Christian fundamentalism, William Jennings Bryan, the three-time Democratic presidential candidate and a fundamentalist hero, volunteered to assist the prosecution. Soon after, the great attorney Clarence Darrow agreed to join the ACLU in the defense, and the stage was set for one of the most famous trials in U.S. history.

CHECK OUT: Rare Footage of the Scopes Monkey Trial  

On July 10, the Monkey Trial got underway, and within a few days hordes of spectators and reporters had descended on Dayton as preachers set up revival tents along the city’s main street to keep the faithful stirred up. Inside the Rhea County Courthouse, the defense suffered early setbacks when Judge John Raulston ruled against their attempt to prove the law unconstitutional and then refused to end his practice of opening each day’s proceeding with prayer.

Outside, Dayton took on a carnival-like atmosphere as an exhibit featuring two chimpanzees and a supposed “missing link” opened in town, and vendors sold Bibles, toy monkeys, hot dogs, and lemonade. The missing link was in fact Jo Viens of Burlington, Vermont, a 51-year-old man who was of short stature and possessed a receding forehead and a protruding jaw. One of the chimpanzees–named Joe Mendi–wore a plaid suit, a brown fedora, and white spats, and entertained Dayton’s citizens by monkeying around on the courthouse lawn.

In the courtroom, Judge Raulston destroyed the defense’s strategy by ruling that expert scientific testimony on evolution was inadmissible–on the grounds that it was Scopes who was on trial, not the law he had violated. The next day, Raulston ordered the trial moved to the courthouse lawn, fearing that the weight of the crowd inside was in danger of collapsing the floor.

In front of several thousand spectators in the open air, Darrow changed his tactics and as his sole witness called Bryan in an attempt to discredit his literal interpretation of the Bible. In a searching examination, Bryan was subjected to severe ridicule and forced to make ignorant and contradictory statements to the amusement of the crowd. On July 21, in his closing speech, Darrow asked the jury to return a verdict of guilty in order that the case might be appealed. Under Tennessee law, Bryan was thereby denied the opportunity to deliver the closing speech he had been preparing for weeks. After eight minutes of deliberation, the jury returned with a guilty verdict, and Raulston ordered Scopes to pay a fine of $100, the minimum the law allowed. Although Bryan had won the case, he had been publicly humiliated and his fundamentalist beliefs had been disgraced. Five days later, on July 26, he lay down for a Sunday afternoon nap and never woke up.

In 1927, the Tennessee Supreme Court overturned the Monkey Trial verdict on a technicality but left the constitutional issues unresolved until 1968, when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a similar Arkansas law on the grounds that it violated the First Amendment.

Citation Information

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The Supreme Court’s use of selective incorporation
spayn [35]
<span>The correct answer is letter c, which is, it takes a subjective case-by-case approach to the question of incorporation in regards with the supreme court’s use of selective incorporation. The case-by-case approach is a way of using a decision forcing case in which the individual involved is likely to play a role of having to face a hard decision that occurred in the past.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help me out w this<br> thanks:)<br> its d.
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the montgomery bus boycott significant to civil rights movement
    12·2 answers
  • Emanuel Leutze’s Washington Crossing the Delaware, describes the historic event when __________________
    14·2 answers
  • How does Etymology provide a deeper meaning of the words we use each day, and maybe our American English language, which we migh
    14·1 answer
  • Which characteristic is most closely associated
    5·1 answer
  • By carefully researching the lives of african americans in a predominantly black neighborhood of philadelphia, w.
    14·1 answer
  • Understanding Time
    6·1 answer
  • Were JP Morgan, Carnegie, and Rockefeller captains of industry or robber barons?
    13·1 answer
  • Regarding the end of the Cold War, what was the most significant event of 1991?
    9·2 answers
  • The Great Compromise during the writing of the Constitution involved
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!