There is a widely published cartoon from President Andrew Jackson’s time in office in which he is portrayed as a king and is labeled as “King Andrew the First.” The implication here is that he is acting more like a king than a president in a democracy. Let us examine why someone might characterize Jackson in this way.
Implied powers are those that the "necessary and proper" language in Article I, Section 8 implies but which are not expressly defined in the constitution.
To enact all laws necessary and appropriate for carrying out the aforementioned powers, as well as all other powers granted to the United States government or any department or officer thereof by this constitution. The Necessary and Proper Clause1 closes up Article I's list of the enumerated powers of Congress by broadly stating that those powers also include the right to employ all appropriate measures to carry out those specified authorities. According to the Necessary and Proper Clause, all Implied and incidental powers that are helpful to the exercise of an enumerated power are included in the congressional power. The history of the Necessary and Proper Clause's insertion in the Constitution and its significance during the ratification discussions are first covered in this section. The section then moves on to early judicial interpretations of the Clause, culminating in Chief Justice John Marshall's famous McCulloch v. Maryland ruling from 1819. The section finishes with a discussion of contemporary Supreme Court opinions on the reach of Congress's jurisdiction under the Implied and Proper Clause, following a brief overview of the significant nineteenth-century Supreme Court decisions on the Clause after McCulloch.
Learn more about Implied and Constitution here:
brainly.com/question/29440625
#SPJ4
Answer: Are you in 6th grade? :0 i just learned ancient civilizations, it's A, by the way
Explanation: They wanted durable currencies that wouldn't break because it would be difficult to start trade and purchase the goods, and if they did break, they'd just be losing money, technically.
Answer:
You can consult Jschlatt about this topic, but until then I think I'll do.
Explanation:
In general, they don't care. That's why it's a sweatshop and not a normal business. The employers are typically in it for the money, which is why the conditions are so unideal (understatement). Someone who valued human life wouldn't force underpaid, malnourished children (or adults for that matter) to work in such horrible circumstances.
The answer is "<span>social learning theory."
Social learning theory refers to a theory of learning and social conduct which recommends that new practices can be gained by watching and emulating others. It expresses that learning is a subjective procedure that happens in a social setting and can happen absolutely through perception or direct guideline, even without motor reproduction or direct fortification.
</span>
