The effect of the civil rights decision of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren is very successful. Chief Warren had a good argument. The Brown decision written by him was supported by all the nine chief justices. That is the correct answer to your question. I hope this answer helped you.
Rating peer performance has an impact on the person being assessed as well as you, the reviewer because it demonstrates an objective assessment that demonstrates maturity and professionalism.
The advantages of rating peer performance are related to broadening the team's perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of each employee, as well as:
- More detailed feedback
- Systematized view
- Cooperation
- Integration
- Responsibility
Therefore, evaluating peer performance can make teams stronger through a closer perspective on the team's needs, making the team more integrated and motivated.
Through effective assessment, the reviewer will also benefit from demonstrating professionalism and maturity.
Learn more about peer performance here:
brainly.com/question/9624547
Answer:
cross-sectional
Explanation:
Cross-sectional research: In cross-sectional research, the experimenter or the researcher examines a group of people, specific context, and a social phenomenon with the help of a sample. The cross sectional-study or research is also known as transverse study, prevalence study, etc. This is a type of an observational study, that examines a particular population data in a specific time.
Advantage:
1. Cost-effective
2. Easy to gather and assess data.
3. Less time taking.
In the give question, Dr Cross is studying the relationship between age and dependency/independence using cross-sectional research.
