Coat and arms Ecuador is the sleeves that's on the coat
Answer:
Excitement
Explanation:
Even though it was the same or almost the same as his old one, he was excited to try this new one out even though it would probably be the same
I hope my answer helps :)
-Animefan28
Answer: Mortification of Self
Explanation:
Mortification to self or self mortification is the practice in which inmate is punished degraded or humiliated so that they can be segregated from their individual personality. They have to undergo such treatments when the inmate is in patient phase.
This process is carried so that identity of the person can be displayed through institution's nature and has no trace of society otr any other factor according to the theory of Goffman.
Answer:
left
Explanation:
Our brain is divided into two hemispheres, left and right. Each hemisphere tends to specialize in controlling different body functions, but a curious thing about our brain is decussated - that is, the left and right hemisphere are crossed: <u>the left hemisphere controls the right side of the body, and the right hemisphere controls the left side</u>. Generally speaking, this means that any damage caused to a hemisphere will manifest on the opposite side of the body. In our example, since the individual is experiencing a tingling on the right side of the face, the MRI will show an abnormality in the brain tissue of the left hemisphere.
Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).
