Answer:
0.77
Step-by-step explanation:
17/22=0.772727273
Rounded to the nearest hundredth that would be
0.77
Law of cosines
:
The law of cosines establishes:

general guidelines:
The law of cosines is used to find the missing parts of an oblique triangle (not rectangle) when either the two-sided measurements and the included angle measure are known (SAS) or the lengths of the three sides (SSS) are known.
Law of the sines:
In ΔABC is an oblique triangle with sides a, b, and c, then:

The law of the sines is the relation between the sides and angles of triangles not rectangles (obliques). It simply states that the ratio of the length of one side of a triangle to the sine of the angle opposite to that side is equal for all sides and angles in a given triangle.
General guidelines:
To use the law of the sines you need to know either two angles and one side of the triangle (AAS or ASA) or two sides and an opposite angle of one of them (SSA).
The ambiguous case
:
If two sides and an angle opposite one of them is given, three possibilities may occur.
(1) The triangle does not exist.
(2) Two different triangles exist.
(3) Exactly a triangle exists.
If we are given two sides and an included angle of a triangle or if we are given 3 sides of a triangle, we can not use the law of the sines because we can not establish any proportion where sufficient information is known. In these two cases we must use the law of cosines
Answer:
The correct option for the answer is C.) $3.29 / $2.96
Step-by-step explanation:
i) national average for a gallon of gas = $2.74
ii) for transportation New York is 1.2 times the National average
therefore one gallon of gas in New York will cost = 1.2
$2.74 = $3.29
iii)for transportation Los Angeles is 1.08 times the National average
therefore one gallon of gas in New York will cost = 1.08
$2.74 = $2.96
Therefore you should expect to pay for gas in New York versus Los Angeles C.) $3.29 / $2.96
Hey i hope my answer is helpful i did in my head so im sorry if its wrong−13 13/35
The events are independent. By definition, it means that knowledge about one event does not help you predict the second, and this is the case: even if you knew that you rolled an even number on the first cube, would you be more or less confident about rolling a six on the second? No.
An example in which two events about rolling cubes are dependent could be something like:
Event A: You roll the first cube
Event B: The second cube returns a higher number than the first one.
In this case, knowledge on event A does change you view on event B (and vice versa): if you know that you rolled a 6 on the first cube you don't want to bet on event B, while if you know that you rolled a 1 on the first cube, you're certain that event B will happen.
Conversely, if you know that event B has happened, you are more likely to think that the first cube rolled a small number, and vice versa.