I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
I believe the answer is: <span>urged to leave and found it difficult to make a living.
Okies refers to the group of people that mostly consist of poor immigrants,that have to rely on farm-related jobs as their primary income.
Dust bowls destroyed many of the agricultural crops in that season and make okies' live became very difficult.</span>
Answer:What qualifies as a natural born US citizen?
The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term "natural born" citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship "by birth" or "at birth," either by being born "in" the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-
Explanation:Hope this helped u also may i have brainlist only if u wanna give me brainlist though! Have an great day ma'am or sir.
A) <span>The War of 1812 had ended.</span>
Base on the given scenario, Rhonda should file a complaint
to the EEOC and not just in any court that she pleases. EEOC or also known as
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the one responsible of
administering laws with the citizens in terms of discrimination that they may
experience in the workplace of which Rhonda felt and experienced.
