The answer is unsure to me because i don't see the examples above, but I'd go with d.
Answer:
ethnic and religious tension one
Explanation:
Answer:
The major difference between them is that Bolivar is less determined to set up a democratic system once independence is gained.
PLEASE GIVE BRAINLY-EST
Answer:
B. Raw materials
Explanation:
During the Nineteenth-century colonization, European nations undergone the scientific revolution. It enable them to mass produce a certain goods like never before at a much faster rate.
This process require a lot of raw materials.
In order to seek cheap source of these materials, the European countries invested in journey to seek for new lands that potentially possess abundance of natural resources. This was the reason why they started colonizing weaker countries.
Answer:
If I lived in a economy in which production, investment, prices, and incomes are determined centrally by a government it would change my life in a lot of different ways. The first way it would be different is I would be paid differently. That could have drastic consequences on my income and investments. I also might not be able to find all the commodities or goods that you would normally be able to find in a market economy. If for some reason I wanted to buy some luxury items: fancy bed, new expensive clothes and such then the state would say no because those items are not needed to survive. Therefore my life would be different in that way. all in all living in this kind of economy would become very different then my current lifestyle
Explanation:
For the other answerer if you highlight the previous answer with the mouse and then right click it the press copy you can paste it on here using ctrl v
