1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yawa3891 [41]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following is NOT true about the use of Internet media during the 2008 election season?

History
1 answer:
photoshop1234 [79]3 years ago
3 0
A.// the answer is A hope this will help someone in the future.
You might be interested in
How is the Embargo Act of 1807 related to England's policy of neutral shipping? It caused England to change it's policy toward n
nirvana33 [79]

The Embargo Act of 1807 is related to England's policy of neutral shipping since it had little to no effect on English shipping.

The Embargo Act of 1807 was a law passed by the United State Congress and signed by President Thomas Jefferson on December 22, 1807. It prohibited American ships from trading in all foreign ports.

The Embargo Act of 1807 constituted a general embargo on all foreign nations enacted by the United States Congress against Great Britain and France during the Napoleonic Wars.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the European Union respond to the 2009 economic crisis?
Zanzabum
The European Union acknowledged the ongoing financial crisis and pledged to rein in all the EU members as well as the member states' central banks to collaborate and assist all the companies that were facing difficulties with liquidity. The EU also called for the credibility of the financial system which would help to put this situation to a halt.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
2 years ago
The English bill of rights put Limits on The Power of
Hunter-Best [27]
I think its the goverment
3 0
3 years ago
What about the political rivalries between empires in Europe made North American exploration so appealing?
Mkey [24]

Answer:   The European nation wanted to gain more wealth and power from these nations. They were able to gain gold through the plantation that were created by the European colonies. They were able to gather more people in their colony through slaves and indentured slaves.  

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What has been the role in world history of pastoral peoples in general and the mongols in particular?
    5·1 answer
  • The historical setting for the composition of the earlier Upanishads was __________________, and _____________.
    11·1 answer
  • In one or two sentences, explain how the rule of law protects the common good
    11·1 answer
  • Why might some women have been critical of the Enlightenment?
    7·1 answer
  • Using complete sentences, define government and discuss its four responsibilities. Identify the three systems of government and
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Louisiana Purchase affect life in Spanish Texas?
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think the us invaded iraq<br>​
    13·1 answer
  • What is the most important contribution the Greeks made to civilization? A) democracy. B) polis Or. C) temples
    15·1 answer
  • Can u help with my homework pease ?
    10·1 answer
  • How can knowing about the industrial revolution help you in the future? (Life long learning)
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!