A tuition difference between in-state and out of state students is an example of: How states make exceptions to the privileges and immunities clause.
<h3><u>What is in-state vs. out-of-state tuition?</u></h3>
The privileges and immunities clause emphasizes that a state cannot discriminatorily treat residents of other states. People from one state need to have the same rights in all of them. This is refuted by the tuition differential between in-state and out-of-state students.
- A student who resides permanently in the state where their university is situated is said to be paying in-state tuition. The cost that out-of-state students, including those from abroad, pay to attend a public state institution is referred to as out-of-state tuition.
- Typically, in-state tuition is far less expensive than out-of-state tuition.
- For instance, the School of Undergraduate Studies at The University of Texas at Austin costs residents of the state $5,624 for 12 or more credits. Out-of-state students pay $19,464 for the same courses, which is a difference of approximately $14,000.
To view more about state, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13487755
#SPJ4
Answer:
joint-stock company
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the type of corporation being mentioned is a joint-stock company. This is a business entity where all the share's of the company have been bought and are held solely by the shareholders. This allows the shareholders to transfer or sell their shares to others without affecting the companies existence.
Answer:
double-barreled question
Explanation:
A double-barreled question is a question that comprises two or more topics or issues , but is expected to have just one answer. A double barreled question is sometimes referred to as an informal fallacy. It also be called a double-direct question or compound question. It is usually advisable to avoid such questions in survey, but can be used in court during cross examination or other researches.
For example the question above touches on two separate issues: the use of reinforcement and the use of punishment at the same time, by parents, as a means to increase the likelihood of desirable behaviors in their children. Stacy found it difficult to answer this question because it is a double-barreled question.
