Answer:
the least likely situation out of those listed here for a scientist to revise her experimental methods, would be if her results support her hypothesis. In this instance, the outcome of the experiment positively provides evidence that the original hypothesis is correct, and the experiment would therefore be a success and not necessarily require repeating.
Explanation:
Answer:
No
Explanation:
The reason why cause you are stupid
Answer:
The correct option is <em>A) Carry out DNA cloning of the desired sequence into a plasmid vector and then put that into bacteria and wait for the bacteria to copy the gene every time the cells divide.</em>
Explanation:
The DNA can be easily cloned by the help of vectors like plasmids. Plasmids can be described as an extra-chromosomal ring which is present in bacteria. The plasmid has many multiple cloning sites where the desired DNA can be incorporated. the plasmid with the foreign DNA is then incorporated back into a bacterial cell. As bacterial cells like E.coli divide in a short period of time, many copied of our DNA could be obtained whenever the bacterial cell replicates.
I've learned that the circulatory system is responsible for transporting nutrients and blood throughout the entire body :D
