Answer:
x = 4 , y = 1
Step-by-step explanation:
3x + 2y = 14 → (1)
x + y = 5 → (2)
Multiplying (2) by - 2 and adding to (1) will eliminate the y- term
- 2x - 2y = - 10 → (3)
Add (1) and (3) term by term to eliminate y
x = 4
Substitute x = 4 into (2) and evaluate for y
4 + y = 5 ( subtract 4 from both sides )
y = 1
Answer:
I’m pretty sure it’s 73% but I’m not completely sure
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.
Hey
Question 1: For this one, we simply need to look at the "fat grams over 25" and the "Total" sections. We can see that 27 out of 50 have fat grams over 25. This written as a percentage is: 54%
Question 2: Using the same logic above we conclude the answer is 45.45%
Question 3: For this we need to look at the "total" section and the answer is 50
Question 4: We add all the "over 300" and write it as a percentage out of 50 which is 14%
Question 5: Same as #1 answer is 21%
Hope this helps
We have that
scale factor=1 in/2.5 miles
<span>the actual area of a lake is 12 square miles
</span>we know that
[area on the map]=[scale factor]²*[area actual]
[area on the map]=[1/2.5]²*[12]-----> 1.92 in²
the answer is
1.92 in²
