Answer: $88.
Step-by-step explanation:
given data:
The cost of the dress for the prom = $22
label of the rack the dresss was on = 50%.
lowest marked price for the dress = 75%.
Solution:
if the lowest marked price of the cloth was already 75%.
and the current cost of the clothe is $22
the original cost of the cloth would be
100% – 75% = 0.25%
= $22 * 100 / 0.25%
= $88.
The original cost of the dress was $88
Answer:
0.8224
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
- standard deviation, sd: $10
- first value of interest, x1: $63
- second value of interest, x2: $90
z-score for x1:
z1 = (x1 - mean)/sd = (63 - 76)/10 = -1.3
z-score for x2:
z2 = (x2 - mean)/sd = (90 - 76)/10 = 1.4
The proportion of wrist watch prices are between $63 and $90 is:
P(z1 < z < z2) = P(z < 1.4) - P(z < -1.3)
P(z < 1.4) = 0.9192 (see first picture attached)
P(z < -1.3) = 0.0968 (see second picture attached)
P(z1 < z < z2) = 0.9192 - 0.0968 = 0.8224
Answer:
M= -2
B=1
Step-by-step explanation:
<u><em>Y-intercept</em></u><em> is the point where the line crosses through the y line, so you can clearly see that that point is (0,1) we only write the y value because for a y intercept the x value will always be zero</em>
<em><u>Slope</u></em> <em>is the rise over run, meaning how much the y value changes over how much the x value changes, so for the two points we use our formula:</em>

<em>So now input how much it changes by adding the numbers from each coordinate:</em>

<u>Simplify:</u>
<u />
<u />
<em>But we write it as:</em>
-4/2
<em>This is because this looks more like division</em>
<u>Divide:</u>
-4/2=-2
So, your slope is <em><u>-2</u></em> and the y- intercept is <em><u>1</u></em>
I hope this helps u pls give a brainliest and a thx ;)
Answer:
D)Yes. The rectangle can have P = 60 and L = 18 because P = 2(18) + 2(12) would equal 60
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is
.
If the width is
and the length is
, then the perimeter becomes:
.
.
.
Therefore the answer is
D)Yes. The rectangle can have P = 60 and L = 18 because P = 2(18) + 2(12) would equal 60
Answer:
This is not correct
Step-by-step explanation:
He could have rolled a 6 on the second roll without rolling a 6 on the first roll, the first roll had ZERO effect on the second one to be able to change what he would roll