Well depends on what year it is but in the early ages it was for land, might need more details though
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>It is always useful to read sentence twice. It removes the confusion and doubt of your first read. Reading multiple times clearly clarifies the sentence. </em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
No there are no any words that I do not know in the sentence. The sentence describes about the difference between the English language and French language.
It focuses in the difference of the syntax of two languages. Even the grammar differs in between two languages. The correct grammar in on language may not be correct in another one.
I'd say it's definitely D
If a story has an unreliable narrator, you should still trust what they say, although you must take it with a grain of salt. The narrator could still be telling the truth, although if they are insane they may describe seeing a ghost when there wasn't really a ghost. An unreliable narrator does not create a fake story, only an unreliable story, where there may be holes or lies weaved into truth.
Pampered indulge with every attention, comfort, and kindness
spoiledharm the character of (a child) by being too lenient or indulgent