Why did americans realize after the war of 1812?

History

1 answer:

Komok [63]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A sense of nationalism was adopted by Americans as well and unity certainly seemed to be present. Although the country became unified in many trivial ways after the War of 1812, for the most part, the United States actually became more divided.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

What was the purpose of the compromise of 1850

Anuta_ua [19.1K]

The Compromise of 1850 was a package of five separate bills passed by the United States Congress in September 1850, which defused a four-year political confrontation between slave and free states on the status of territories acquired during the Mexican–American War (1846–1848).

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The demand for automobiles in the 1920s

Vesnalui [34]

I believe the demand for automobiles in the 1920s stimulated growth in many other industries. Think of the other things that came after automobiles. ;)

6 0

3 years ago

Give examples of three cash crops that grown in Latin America and explain why they were cash crops

egoroff_w [7]

Hey there!

Here is your answer:

The proper answer to this question is " corn, coca, coffee, and sweet potato".

Reason:

Cash crops are crops that make the country wealthy most importantly gives that country its wealth and because of these crops it has its wealth. 

Also....

 Corn, coca, coffee, and sweet potato are one of the most common cash crops in South America!

Therefore the answers are  corn, coca, coffee, sweet potato!

If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!

Hope this helps!

~Nonportrit

6 0

3 years ago

HELPP PLSSS What three principles did delegates at the Constitution Convention want to include?

yaroslaw [1]

Answer: Important takeaways

Explanation:

The three major compromises were the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the Electoral College. The Great Compromise settled matters of representation in the federal government.

5 0

3 years ago

Burke insists that the historical foundations of france were fundamentally sound, and thus the revolution of 1789 was unnecessar

Aliun [14]

If your options are: a) The competing interests of the people were institutionalized in the Estates General, generating a "reciprocal struggle" that would reconcile discordant powers, b) The monarchy, though occasionally unjust, provided stability and security, c) The "discordant interests" of the various corporate bodies of France— the guilds, municipalities, nobility, and 
clergy— were mediated by the monarch and his officials, and d) All of the above, the correct answer in my opinion is d) All of the above. Burke provides a comprehensive critique of the French revolution in all of its aspects. Even though he admits it was a remarkable event, he disagrees that it would bring about a new, more just and sound political system. Of course, the old monarchy was bad in many respects, but it didn't have to be abolished altogether. It could be fixed. Instead, monarchy was replaced by anarchy and traditions were violently dismantled.

8 0

3 years ago