Answer:
Explanation:
A chemical reaction describes the reaction between reactants to produce products.
A chemical equation is represented as a reactant present on the left-hand side of the equation if two or more reactants are present they are separated by the "plus" sign.
On the right side of the equation product is written and if more than one product is formed then these are separated by "plus" sign as in the reactants.
The reactant and the products are separated by an arrow, the head of arrow is in the direction of the product when the reaction is irreversible.
In the case of reversible reactions or chemical reactions that are present in equilibrium, the reactant and product are separated by a double-headed arrow.
At STP, it is at 273 K and 1.00 atm.
Use PV=nRT to and solve for n (number of mol of N2)
1.00 atm • 4.40L / 0.08206 Latm/molK • 273 K = 0.196 mol N2
There are two mol of N2 for every two mol of NH4NO2 (the number of mol of both are equal)
Find the molar mass of NH4NO2 = 64.1 g
Multiply the number of mol by the molar mass
0.196 mol • 64.1 = 12.6 g NH4NO2
Cutting pepper
cutting onion
folding eggs over
cutting ham
mixing eggs(...?)
hope this helped!
Confirmation bias<span>, also called </span>confirmatory bias<span> or </span>myside bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less consideration to alternative possibilities.[Note 1][1]<span> It is a type of </span>cognitive bias<span> and a systematic error of </span>inductive reasoning<span>. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a </span>biased way<span>. The effect is stronger for </span>emotionally<span> charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. People also tend to interpret ambiguous </span>evidence<span> as supporting their existing position. Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain </span>attitude polarization<span> (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), </span>belief perseverance<span> (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series) and </span>illusory correlation<span> (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations).</span>
