1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
3 years ago
7

Which word means that a person's statements are likely to be believed.

English
2 answers:
wolverine [178]3 years ago
5 0
Credible would be


Someone who's credible is honest and believable. ... Similar to words like reliable and plausible, credible is an adjective that comes to us from the Latin credibilis, meaning “worthy to be believed.” A credible reputation is often earned through consistent good behavior and an overall trustworthy personality.
Rasek [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

credible

Explanation:

Means to be convincing or to be able to be belived

You might be interested in
Which of the following shows the first person, present perfect tense of the word play?
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

what does present perfect tense mean?

Explanation:

but, “plays” is present, meaning it’s happening now. “have played” is in the past tense, meaning it already happened. “will have played” is in the future tense, meaning it will happen in the future and hasn’t happened yet

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where is the line between holding people accountable for their actions and publicly shaming them? What kind of offenses or trans
Margaret [11]

Answer:

Brainliest

Explanation:

I found this article which I feel is appropriate on the subject. It differentiates between shaming for the  sake of shaming, and shaming to hold someone accountable. Or bad shaming vs. good shaming in the words of the author.

There are times when the level of shaming rises above what many feel appropriate.

There was an instance where a woman mentioned in the above article sent a tweet many deemed inappropriate to her 170 followers, someone saw it and reported on it and the internet went nuts and she was fired by the time her plane landed. Was it a smart thing to do on her part, No. But, in my opinion, that was an instance of shaming that went to an inappropriate level.

I got some criticism (rightfully so) for an article I posted (and removed about 24 hours later) on a runner that pretended to run Boston, and used another runner’s name and time. It was fascinating – but could have been told in a way that kept her identity private, or not told at all. I made a misttake. I was wrong for posting that article. I’ve learned from that and have accepted the criticism.

What about Rachel Dolezal? Most would argue that the reporting on her was appropriate. She rose to a position of power, partially by misrepresenting herself. It’s not much different than a fitness coach that embellishes his credentials to gain clients.

When someone is paid by clients and has earned sponsorships based at least partly on their running ability, presenting evidence that some of  their accomplishments are not legitimate is not shaming for the sake of shaming, it is holding them accountable.

Their clients deserve to know the facts. They deserve the truth. They may chose to ignore this information, but they deserve the opportunity  to make that decision. If you hire a financial planner, or a C.P.A, or go to the doctor, you would want to know if there is evidence that their credentials are less than they claim. The same holds true if you spend your money to hire a trainer/running coach. You may not care whether they qualified for Boston or not, but you may care that this person that you trusted and admired  may have been less than honest.

There are those that want me to release the names of all the runners that have been identified from Boston ’15. In my opinion, most of those cases would fall under the ‘Bad shaming’. I am responsible for everything I post. It would not feel right to me if the firefighter mentioned in the Runner’s World article lost his job over his decision to cut the course to qualify for Boston. The proper consequence, in my opinion, would be disqualification from both the qualifier and Boston.

7 0
2 years ago
Morris is a high school student preparing for the SAT. As he studies vocabulary for the test, he knows that he needs to stay foc
igomit [66]

Answer:

The answer would be B-declarative knowledge

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the BEST source for finding the meaning of the word hypothalamus?
DENIUS [597]
A dictionary gives definitions
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
She really wanted to read the book
Aleksandr [31]

the answer is B hope this helps!!!

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Beyond the? timberline, tourists can see? snow-capped mountains. A. Direct object B. Subject C. Object of a preposition
    6·2 answers
  • How are a persuasive essay and an expository essay different?
    10·2 answers
  • SOMEONE HELP ME WITH THIS QUESTION PLZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!...............
    13·2 answers
  • Connective tissue ensheathing the entire<br> Inuscle
    15·1 answer
  • You are convincing your parents to buy you a rabbit write your own persuasive
    13·1 answer
  • In act lll<br> , who become suspicious of macbeth from the king murder of king Duncan
    6·1 answer
  • Question 2
    7·1 answer
  • Mercutio is? (Romeo &amp; Juliet)
    7·2 answers
  • Add or remove commas, if necessary, until the sentence has correct punctuation.
    6·1 answer
  • A semicolon can replace what part of speech?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!