Answer: 1) Political Issues, 2) Single-species conservation, 3) Flagship species, 4) Umbrella species, 5) Ecosystem functioning
Explanation:
Ecological factors aren't generally the fundamental criteria for preservation methodologies. Rather, economic consideration, __Political Issue__ , and the management concerns oblige which living spaces can be protected. While the __Single-species conservation__approach doesn't consider whole the environments, it might bring about their protection. Single charming species or __Flagship species__ can be utilized as symbols of the preservation exertion to instruct people in general on the requirement for protection and to improve the probability of private and public financing. By securing what protectionists allude to as a __Umbrella species__ , living space required for different species is preserved. The protection of one animal types can have an exceptionally articulated effect on different species and __Ecosystem functioning__ .
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. Christopher will be paying higher or lower life insurance premium than Jeff because insurance companies consider riding a motorcycle to be more dangerous than driving a truck. Hope this answers the question.
Answer:
overestimated the accuracy of eyewitnesses.
Explanation:
Cutler, Penrod, and Dexter (1990) conducted several experiments exposing mock jurors to expert testimony about the accuracy of eyewitnesses. The authors of this study found that participants who were NOT exposed to the expert testimony overestimated the accuracy of eyewitnesses.
Answer:
A: The rule of Diocletian