The constitutional principle that worked during the estimation of the 2010 Census is referred to as reapportionment.
<h3>Which constitutional principle worked in the 2010 Census?</h3>
- In 2010, there was a census held in the United States that was widely participated in.
- The result of the census was determined through reapportionment.
- In conducting the decennial census, the seats of the U.S. House of Representatives were reapportioned.
- The seats of the legislative body are distributed among administrative units and subdivisions.
- This had a direct impact on the elections conducted in 2012.
- Therefore, reapportionment was a constitutional principle operative in the 2010 decennial census.
- Article two of the US Constitution explains the nature, scope, and features of reapportionment.
Therefore, the constitutional principle that worked during the estimation of the 2010 Census is referred to as reapportionment.
Learn more about the 2010 United States Census here: brainly.com/question/3217491
#SPJ2
The statement regarding "The Missouri Compromise, 1820."which is true is A<u> ----No new territories would be allowed to have </u><u>slavery.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?</h3>
The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to maintain a balance between the number of slave states and the number of free states in the Union. It permits Missouri to enter as a slave state at the same Maine would be as a free state, thus maintaining a balance in numbers of free and slave states<u>.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What was the Missouri Compromise ?</h3>
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, was a law that tried the attention of growing sectional tensions over the issue of slavery. By passing this law, President James Monroe signed, the U.S. Congress admitted Missouri to the Union as a state that allowed slavery, and Maine regarded as a free state.
Learn more about Missouri Compromise:
brainly.com/question/14383383
#SPJ1
Pacific island that became a triple protectorate of the United States, Britain, and Germany <span>B) French Indochina</span>
Answer:
Low standards of education for black people's children.
Explanation:
There will be large differences between schools if the Supreme Court had not disprove “separate but equal” in the Brown decision because the schools where black children gets education is not of high standard as compared to the schools where white people's children get education. There are more chances for the white children in the field as compared to black children due to unequal standards of education. There will be high racial discriminations in the society among black and white people.
