The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice.
<span>Experts argue that a significant water shortage by 2025 will be caused by drastic increase in water usage caused by humans.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
it is right
Explanation:
Animals get the nitrogen they need by eating plants or other animals that contain nitrogen. When organisms die, their bodies decompose bringing the nitrogen into soil on land or into ocean water. Bacteria alter the nitrogen into a form that plants are able to use.
Answer:
Explanation:
Dhiki (Nepali : ढिकी [ɖʱiki]), Dhinki or ढिँकि in Odia, is a traditional Nepalese rice (millet etc.) beater used in villages. In Odia,it is called Dhinki ଢିଙ୍କି. The manual wooden thresher 'Dhiki' is made of wood and works like a lever, but is instead used for grinding. The framework consists of a fulcrum having two pillars on each side, an effort area (where one person stands on the long thick plank of wood making effort at every interval), a long and thick plank of horizontal wood which has a small vertical extension that goes into a hole made in the ground. It is in this hole that the grains or dry chillies are kept to transform them into powder. the person using this usually places his/her leg on one side and press it hard and then leave it so that the other part hits the rice, millet, etc. and grinds it. It works like the see-saw i.e. when one part's up the other one's down and vice versa. It is a local technology used in nepali villages. When, rice mill was not used, this Dhinki used to dehusk the rice, make various powders like rice powder, masala powder etc. The dehusked rice was very healthy as it was not polished. The device required two persons. One to push the log upward by foot pressing of the lever downward and the second person rotate the rice load for uniform pounding.
1.........................
The answer is "it is called bio-ethics".
Bioethics is the investigation of ordinarily questionable morals achieved by progresses in science and solution. Bioethicists frequently differ among themselves over the exact furthest reaches of the discipline, debating whether the field should worry about the moral assessment of all inquiries including science and solution, or just a subset of these inquiries.
