Answer: .
Vote, voice an opinion at a city council meetings, or write to an elected leader
Explanation:
The question is about how an Arizona citizen could influence local political decisions.
Option A about voting every 4 years during the presidential election will not affect the local political decision but rather affects federal decision since voting for the president is at the Federal level.
Option B is about voting, voicing an opinion at a city council meetings, or writing to an elected leader. This shows that the decision being taken here will influence local politics. Here, the decision affects the lowest level of government which is at the local level.
Option C about accepting that nothing can be done and try to avoid being frustrated about local issues is wrong. Everyone has to role to play in governance and doing this won't impact positively on the local politics.
Subscribing to a news app, and watching the presidential debates or share political news on social media isn't influencing local political decisions in Arizona.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
This is two or more equations with common variables, also known as a linear system. System Of Equations
The cannon, from the fort, were moved overland to Boston and used to force the British to evacuate Boston.
Explanation:
- During the American Revolutionary War, the fortress was attacked again in May 1775, when the Green Mountain Boys and the militias of other states under the command of Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold captured the fort in a surprise attack.
- The captured cannons were transferred to Boston, where their deployment forced the British to leave the city in March 1776 after a months-long siege of Boston.
- The Americans held the fort until June 1777, when British forces under General John Burgoyne reconquered the fort and threatened members of the Continental Army.
Learn more on Fort Ticonderoga on
brainly.com/question/371939
brainly.com/question/1832902
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
On March 8, 1965, two battalions of about 3,500 Marines waded ashore on Red Beach 2 — becoming the first American combat troops deployed to Vietnam. Six months before the landing — in the midst of a presidential election campaign — Johnson told an audience at University of Akron in Ohio, “We are not about to send American boys nine or 10,000 miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves.”
Three months after that speech, a victorious Johnson said in his inaugural address: “We can never again stand aside, prideful in isolation. Terrific dangers and troubles that we once called ‘foreign’ now constantly live among us.”
By 1965 a confluence of events — South Vietnamese defeats on the battlefield, political turmoil in Saigon and North Vietnamese resolve in the face of an American bombing campaign — had come together to produce a situation in which Washington faced the choice of war or disengagement.At the height of the Cold War, phrases like “American credibility” and “the Domino Theory” — a belief that defeat in South Vietnam would spread communism throughout Southeast Asia — clouded judgment as Washington weighed its options.
When Johnson assumed the presidency Nov. 22, 1963, after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the new president inherited a Cold War foreign policy forged during the three previous administrations. At the heart of that policy was confronting communism.
The failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, the building of the Berlin Wall and communist incursions into Vietnam’s neighbor Laos had convinced Kennedy that the U.S. needed to stand firm against communist expansion. Kennedy told a New York Times journalist in 1961 that “we have a problem making our power credible and Vietnam looks like the place.”
Although reluctant to commit ground combat forces, Kennedy increased the number of U.S. military advisers to 16,000 — up from 900 who had been there since President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s administration.
Explanation:
i hope this helped
Chile’s economy is considered to be one of the strongest in Latin America while Venezuela’s economy is declining. The World Bank ranked Chile as high-income economy while Venezuela is considered to be one of the worst economies. Chile has good economic policies that enabled the growth. Chile’s economy is well-managed while Venezuela’s economic policies were unsound. Venezuela’s resources were mismanaged. The decline of Venezuela’s economy was due to various factors like political instability, food crisis and money devaluation among other.
