Similarities existed in terms of their organization, leadership and justice system among others.
Similarly, both empires were large; they covered large geographical areas with huge populations.
They also shared an interest in trade.
Coaches and players should be allowed to pray on the field after a game, and this does not violate separation of church and state, because base on this, government is expected to be neutral as regards religion activities.
<h3>What is separation of church and state and the impact on players ?</h3>
Separation of church and state serves as the idea that is base on the ground that government should not have any bias interest as regards all religions.
This means that government should not officially recognize or favor any one religion, and on the playing field too, it should not be a case, for praying base on individual religion after the match.
It should be noted that the First Amendment, that is been put in place in 1791, explain that "Congress should not be involved in making any law that can bring about the establishment of religion, even though the "separation of church and state" is not found in the United States Constitution.
Learn more about religion on:
brainly.com/question/11541955
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Dawes Plan/ Young Plan helped Germany to start to rebuild after WW1.
Explanation:
Dawes: The Dawes Plan (as proposed by the Dawes Committee, chaired by Charles G. Dawes) was a plan in 1924 that successfully resolved the issue of World War I reparations that Germany had to pay. It ended a crisis in European diplomacy following World War I and the Treaty of Versailles.
The plan provided for an end to the Allied occupation, and a staggered payment plan for Germany's payment of war reparations. Because the Plan resolved a serious international crisis, Dawes shared the Nobel Peace Prize in 1925 for his work.
It was an interim measure and proved unworkable. The Young Plan was adopted in 1929 to replace it. (from wiki article on Dawes Plan)
Young Plan:The Young Plan was a program for settling Germany's World War I reparations written in August 1929 and formally adopted in 1930. It was presented by the committee headed (1929–30) by American industrialist Owen D. Young, creator and ex-first chairman of the Radio Corporation of America (RCA), who, at the time, concurrently served on the board of trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation, and also had been one of the representatives involved in a previous war-reparations restructuring arrangement—the Dawes Plan of 1924. The Inter-Allied Reparations Commission established the German reparation sum at a theoretical total of 132 billion, but a practical total of 50 billion gold marks. After the Dawes Plan was put into operation in 1924, it became apparent that Germany would not willingly[citation needed] meet the annual payments over an indefinite period of time.[citation needed] The Young Plan reduced further payments by about 20 percent. Although the theoretical total was 112 billion Gold Marks, equivalent to US ca. $27 billion in 1929 (US$ 119 billion in 2020) over a period of 58 years,[1] which would end in 1988, few expected the plan to last for much more than a decade.[2] In addition, the Young Plan divided the annual payment, set at two billion Gold Marks, US $473 million, into two components: one unconditional part, equal to one third of the sum, and a postponable part, equal to the remaining two-thirds, which would incur interest and be financed by a consortium of American investment banks coordinated by J.P. Morgan & Co. (wiki article on young plan)
