What dispute during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 was settled by the Three-Fifths Compromise?

1 answer:

4 0

The dispute that happened during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 was distributing the House of Representatives based on the population of that state.

During this time, the North and the South were arguing about whether or not slaves should count towards the population of that state. If you had a bigger population, you would get more House of Representatives in Congress. Slaves were not equally seen as people, so some thought slaves should count towards the population, while some did not.

The Three-Fifths Compromise solved this. This made it so every five slaves counted as three people in terms of counting the population. This was good for the South, as it meant they would have a greater population and more House of Representatives.

You might be interested in

What does Jefferson conclude as the only remedy to the British Crown's failure to hold up its part of the social contract betwee

Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

hhgfgjkhggfgjjhvcxzsdhknbcxxgkmnbcxdx

3 0

3 years ago

President Reagan’s involvement in the strike by federal air traffic controllers in 1981

Setler [38]

Answer:

a. showed his unwillingness to take a stand on an important issue.

<u><em>B. prompted the firing of controllers who refused to return to work.</em></u>

c. demonstrated his support for the rights of union workers.

d. caused all of the striking workers to return to their jobs.

ok bye bye now, have a blessed day!

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Mexico and America share a similar story as they were both European colonies that broke away from their

Ad libitum [116K]

True

-United States used to be a North American colony of England

-Mexico used to be a North American colony of Spain

4 0

3 years ago

Lunchroom fight evidence context?

siniylev [52]

Answer:

that there was a fight in the lunchroom during lunch. You've asked many ... student Handout - lunchroom Fight: evidence Context Handout.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Analyze how the Bill of Rights limits the powers of the federal government and state governments

Talja [164]

The Federalists argued that they did not need a Bill of Rights because the people and states kept any powers that was not given to the Federal Government. On the other hand, Anti-Federalists said that a Bill of Rights was necessary in order to safeguard individual liberty.
The Bill of Rights is a list of limits on the Government. For example, the founders saw that the first amendment was a natural right and prohibits from making laws establishing religion and abridging (remove or shorten; rights or privileges) freedom of speech.

Hope this Helps! (:

6 0

3 years ago

What dispute during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 was settled by the Three-Fifths Compromise?​

What dispute during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 was settled by the Three-Fifths Compromise?