1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vikki [24]
3 years ago
5

What dispute during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 was settled by the Three-Fifths Compromise?​

History
1 answer:
NARA [144]3 years ago
4 0

The dispute that happened during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 was distributing the House of Representatives based on the population of that state.

During this time, the North and the South were arguing about whether or not slaves should count towards the population of that state. If you had a bigger population, you would get more House of Representatives in Congress. Slaves were not equally seen as people, so some thought slaves should count towards the population, while some did not.

The Three-Fifths Compromise solved this. This made it so every five slaves counted as three people in terms of counting the population. This was good for the South, as it meant they would have a greater population and more House of Representatives.

You might be interested in
In order to override a presidential veto, Congress must pass the bill again, but this time with a super majority.
DochEvi [55]

Answer: 67 percent

Explanation: Done this before

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP 98 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jobisdone [24]

1. Pope Urban calls for the First Crusade. At the council of

Clermont, Pope Urban decided to call for the first crusade in 1095. Urban’s

call came from the desire to stop the Turks from westward expansion. This

decision came as a result of the Byzantine Emperor’s plea to send military

assistance due to the larger and larger threat of Turkish expansion.

2. Major rulers refuse to support the war. Due to their

issues with the Pope, both Philip I of France and Emperor Henry IV refused to

support the Pope’s desires in the crusade to come. What is odd about this is

that although they won’t participate, noblemen from their own countries will.

They would also be joined by many soldiers from areas of Italy and Germany as

well.

3. Crusaders take Jerusalem. After a siege of the city, the

soldiers of various nations managed to enter Jerusalem where the Turks were

eliminated indiscriminately. People of other religions such as Jews and Eastern

Christians also suffered losses due to the nature of the Crusaders’ attacks.

With this victory, the Kingdom of Jerusalem is established which makes the area

belong to Christians once again.

4. The second crusade called by Pope Eugene III. After the

fall of Edessa, Pope Eugene called for the second crusade to end the Seljuk aggression

and expansion. The crusade ended badly for the Crusaders as an Islamic victory

managed to keep them out of the territory and prevent them from establishing an

independent Edessa once again.

5. Henry and Philip join forces to start a new crusade.

Following the failure of the second, Henry of England and Philip of France

joined forces in order to start a new crusade with the goal being recapturing

Jerusalem from Saladin. Although they had many victories, the ultimate goal of

conquering Jerusalem ultimately failed, causing the Treaty of Jaffa and the

cease of hostilities.

6. Crusaders join forces once again for the same cause.

Following the failure to recapture Jerusalem, the fourth crusade began led by

forces from the Holy Roman Empire and the republic of Venice. Since they were

supported by the current Pope, they also managed to get the support of the

Christian world which more than 20 000 soldiers.

7. Crusaders turn on Byzantine. Although the goal of the fourth

crusade was capturing the city of Jerusalem, in the middle of the Crusade the

crusaders decided to switch their goal and attack the Byzantine Empire. What

nobody expected became true and they managed to sack the city of

Constantinople, which was a huge victory for Venetians who had bad relations

with Byzantine for years before this clash.

8. The Crusader spirit starts to dwindle. Due to numerous

losses during the previous crusades, the support for a holy war started

diminishing rapidly. This led to a series of future crusades that were not

successful at all and which had almost no support. This included the fifth,

sixth, seventh, and eight crusades, all of which were nowhere near the size of

the first four.

9. Ninth crusade ends it all. In what became known as the

final crusade, the Christian world lost yet again after an initial series of

victories. However, the crusaders were eventually forced to withdraw and leave

the area just as it was before the war began. Considering nobody wanted to join

the crusades anymore, this event goes down in history as the final large

crusade.

10. Small incursions run rampant. Throughout the history of

the crusades, numerous smaller crusades occurred which weren’t even named

according to the ordinal numbers. These were mostly smaller skirmishes that did

not influence the tides of war much. They usually occurred during the same time

as the ordinal crusades, but were at different places and led by different

people.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8626981#readmore

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4 things that have changed since 2,500 B.C.<br> City states in Mesopotamia
12345 [234]

Answer:

As the Sumerian villages grew into large cities, they formed city-states. ... All of these things were important for the development of human civilization.planation:

5 0
2 years ago
What do you think is a valid reason for a country to go to war? Read the reasons below and decide whether you think each reason
SCORPION-xisa [38]
Hey!
Hope this helps...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I do not believe there is the right reason for any country to go into war. Although if I had to pick one reason that a country might go into a war, or a reason that could be justifiable for going into war. My decision would be going into war to protect an ally from an invasion.
This is not because of the thought of war, this is because if a country lose his allies, it would be defenseless when war is thrust of the pawn that country who needed that Ally.

So i would say the answer is: B.) to protect an Ally from an invasion.
8 0
4 years ago
Hàm số y = -3x + 2 là *
muminat

Answer:

huh

Explanation:

This is history, not mathematics.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Unlike her husband, a peasant woman worked in her family’s home as well as in the field. at least six days a week. only after he
    7·2 answers
  • The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was signed into law in what year?
    8·2 answers
  • It say Select all that apply you only picked one
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the Spanish start to import enslaved Africans to the Americas? Why did this practice increase over time?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a resource that comes from coconut palms? A. manufacturing materials B. sugar C. vinegar D. cough
    12·2 answers
  • Look at some photographs of mt evrest in your textbook/internet. What are some interesting differences about mt evrest? List the
    8·1 answer
  • In the case Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ruled that state laws
    7·2 answers
  • Match the place to its importance in the early church. Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column. 1 .
    9·2 answers
  • Approximately ___________ percent of the world's population currently lives in a constitutional democracy.
    12·1 answer
  • What factors did slave traders consider when transporting their captives to the Americas?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!