Answer:
The government had already tried hard to judge the middle road of the public benefit against industries or companies, but it has also figured out a way of developing this practice.
An example of this will be legislation financing charter schools, that in general education may be seen as better schools. If that is so, charter schools are generally of the public interest, thus allowing the small group of people who operate these charter schools (sometimes for profit) corporations to operate these schools and the government. They often work in charter schools.
Explanation:
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.
Answer:
yhjitvfjnvjeqnacvjneqdcijodnqcjow nj
Explanation:
Answer:
True.
You don't have to be a party to a case.
Explanation: