Answer:
The larger images show people unconcerned and continuing with daily life.
Explanation:
In "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus" the viewer can see why Brueghel does not believe that Icarus' destiny has changed the world, or that it has been at least relevant to someone. This is because when we observe the painting, we will see several people who did not even realize what happened to Ícarus, did not see the fall or even his death, which shows that this event was completely irrelevant for them and that is why they remain their daily lives as if nothing had happened.
The statement best compares the two passages in that the first passage hints that the family should not trust Walter with money or business matters, and the second passage confirms it.
<h3>What are the comparisons between both the passages?</h3>
The first passage intimations that no trust should be placed in Walter regarding business matters and Beneatha and Ruth respond to this by interchanging diverted looks, which allow that this is an open lie.
And in the second passage, we get the confirmation of what is hinted in the first when the Mother, after finding out what happened, starts propelling her son, in anger, not recognizing him as her son, until Beneatha interacts.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about passages, refer:
brainly.com/question/23662376
The answer would be:
<span>3. In time, of course, all issues get resolved, but not necessarily in the way you would like.</span>
A symbolic narrative is also known as an allegory.
An allegory is something that reveals a symbol or a hidden meaning.
So our answer is correct.
Final answer:- <span>A. Allegory </span>
