Answer:
Each player can adopt a T for T strategy or a trigg er strategy. It is important to state that these strategies were not possible in a one-time game.
The equilibrium is that both players answer honest and each makes normal profit.
Both games, the P risoners' dilemma and this game, have a cooperative equilibrium in the long term. If a player employs a trig ger strategy or a T for T strategy, they can reach the cooperative honesty/honesty outcome.
In a short term, game equilibrium is not likely due to lying is more profitable than answer honestly deploying stated strategies.
Reference: NomCab HSEONE. “PS8- solution.” Academia , 2019.
Answer:
Evidence based.
Explanation:
Evidence: It is something that furnishes proof or testimony or something legally submitted to ascertain in the truth of matter.
Evidence basedis the conscientious (effort), explicit (clarity) and judicious (critical of quality) use of the best available evidence from multiple sources to increase the likelihood of a favourable outcome.
Characteristics:
- It’s about the process
- It’s not about certainties (this will work)
- It’s is about probabilities and likelihoods
- It is about reducing uncertainty (given our context this is more likely to lead to the outcome we want than doing something else or doing nothing)
Answer:
<h2>The answer in this case would be True.</h2>
Explanation:
- In this case,the auctioneer has not made any special announcement regarding the sale or especially,has not announced the official conclusion of the sale.
- Since,the auctioneer hasn't officially signaled the end or conclusion of the sale,it technically implies that the auction or sale of the concerned product or item is still operational and anyone can offer a value to bid for the product or item.
- Therefore,based on the general rule or regulation of any official public auction,the bidder can officially withdraw his bid and let it pass to other bidders before the final and official conclusion of the sale as per the indication of the auctioneer.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
The hand book gave to other employes did the same so should jon.
Answer: sightseeing
Explanation:
Opportunity costs represent to the potential benefits that an economic entity misses out on when another alternative is chosen over another.
In this case, due to the increase in the price of the plane ticket, Mikael decides to give up visiting the popular Ouro Preto during his stay in Brazil even though it was earlier planned. Therefore, it can be infered that sightseeing is the opportunity cost as that is what he forgoes in order to choose a different alternative.
