Answer:
We don't have sufficient evidence to support the claim
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis:
Alternate hypothesis:
The P-value is 0.3064
0.3064 probability of finding a sample proportion lower than the one found.
The p-value is higher than the significance level of 0.05, which means that there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim.
Answer:
67
Step-by-step explanation:
(4*100)/6
=400/6
=66.67
Round to get 67
The amount after 3 years would be $221.74
<u>Explanation:</u>
Given:
Principal, P = $200
Rate of interest, r = 3.5%
Time, t = 3 years
Amount, A = ?
We know:
Substituting the value we get:
Therefore, the amount after 3 years would be $221.74
I would use a proportion for the Fred's Fouls part. Use the closest point to 12 possible, which is (15, 69.5).
Set up the proportion like so:
15/69.5 = 12/x
Now cross multiply.
15x = 834
Now divide both sides by 15 to get x by itself.
x = 55.6
Fred's Fouls will charge $55.60 for 12 wings.
Now plug in 12 as x for the Carlie's Chicken part and solve for f(12).
f(12) = 3.75(12) +10
f(12) = 45 +10
f(12) = 55
Carlie's Chicken will charge $55 for 12 wings.
Answer:
99 ÷ 9 equal 11
Step-by-step explanation:
99 ÷ 9 = 11. yeah
