When travelling north from the United States into Canada, you'll see the north star (polaris) getting higher in the sky. Hence, option B is correct.
<h3>What is
polaris?</h3>
The polestar, commonly referred to as the North Star, is a star of second magnitude that may be seen close to the celestial North Pole. It is the outermost light in the Little Dipper's handle.
The term "polar star," which is short for stella polaris in New Latin and was first used during the Renaissance when the star was only a few degrees from the celestial pole, is now known as Polaris.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about polaris, click here:
brainly.com/question/25885813
#SPJ1
The options are missing -
A) lower in the sky
B) higher in the sky
C) dimmer brighter
The jews wander without a country for about 40 years before reaching there destination
Answer:
The reason as to why longitude lines converge while latitude lines do not is;
Explanation:
- That latitude lines are parallel to the equator, which means they cannot meet with the equator. They measure the distance from the equator to the north and south, they therefore do not converge.
- On the other hand, longitudes measure distance from the equator to the east and west, they meet at the north and south pole thereby converging.
Aztecs irrigated and reclaimed swampland so that they could farm.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Aztec refers to people of Central Mexico speaking Nahuatl. The Aztecs were known for introducing irrigation, agriculture and cultivating the land. These people involved in draining swamps and creating artificial islands in the lakes. The artificial island is used for farming.
Aztecs were involved in building pyramids and temples. They learned irrigation to change their habits. Farming became their major occupation. Hieroglyphic writing was introduced by Aztecs. Complex calendar system was implemented and used by Aztecs.
Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
