Answer:
0J
Explanation:
Mass of the lump M1 = 1.0 kg, initial velocity of the lump U1 = 2m/s to the right,
mass of the metal sphere M2 = 0.5kg, initial velocity of the metal sphere M2 = -4m/s to the left. using conservation law of momentum;
M1U1 + M2U2 = V (M1 + M2)
(1.0 × 2) + (0.5 × -4) = V (1 + 0.5)
2 -2 = V (1.5)
0 = V (1.5)
divide both side by 1.5
0/1.5 = V 1.5/1.5
V = 0
since final velocity after sticking together of the two masses equals zero then their combined kinetic energy will also equal to zero
1/2 V(M1 +M2)
1/2 ×0 × 1.5 = 0J
Idk sorry ask someone else trololololo
Many people wanted to get jobs in factories for example and kids work now and they worked in horrible conditions and got very little pay
Okay, think of an essay or paragraph as like stating your opinion. Here’s how to break it down so it’s a little easier:
Paragraph 1 - Introduction.
Provide background information on the topic. Give about 1-2 sentences on what the topic is about, and for the 3rd sentence, put in a statement that IS your argument.
For example, “French fries are the best food ever because they are delicious.”
Paragraph 2 - Conflict.
Elaborate on your argument/thesis statement. Since that seems to be your conflict, describe something hard you’ve been through. What was hard about it? How did it affect you?
Paragraph 3 - Response
Elaborate more on how the conflict affected you personally. If you can, try to connect it to a bigger picture or theme.
For example, “I broke my leg in middle school as a result of a basketball injury. Therefore, we should eliminate school sports because they cause injuries.”
It’s a reach, but that’s the entire point of connecting to a bigger theme.
Paragraph 4 - Explain Response
Here is where you’re going to connect your response in paragraph 3 to a bigger picture. Talk about the outcome and effect you showed in paragraph 3.
The questions mentioned should help you- break it down in a way that you understand. I tried to simplify this for you in the easiest way possible, I hope it helps and good luck :)
1974 - United States v. Nixon
This decision established that executive privilege is neither absolute nor unqualified.
Situation: President Richard Nixon's taped conversations from 1971 onward were the object of subpoenas by both the special prosecutor and those under indictment in the Watergate scandal. The president claimed immunity from subpoena under executive privilege.
The Court decided against Nixon 8-0.
Historical significance:
The president is not above the law. After the Court ruled on July 24, 1974, Richard Nixon resigned
