Answer: Because each state was looking out for its personal interests in regard to representation in Congress.
Details:
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on the representation of states in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
Answer:
How was the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen similar to the American Declaration of Independence? Both documents emphasized freedom, equality, and natural rights for men. ... Ending Church interference and ensuring equality for male citizens reflected Enlightenment goals.
Explanation:
The <span>navigation acts & mercantilism were aimed to limit the trade within
the empire and had put many restrictions, the reason was that the British did
not want to lose the valuable gold and assets to foreigners, the Sugar Act and
such restrictions forced the colonists away from foreign products and this
caused the colonies to anger. The result was a great dissatisfaction against
British and eventually the Revolutionary war.</span>
Answer:
C- Separation of powers
Explanation:
Seperation of power is the system whereby responsibilities and power are divided and assigned to various arm of the gvernment inorder to ensure effecient and effective delivery of the dividends of democracy to the citizens.
This principle recognizes the fact that, despite the laws and rules of the federal government oft United States, the individual states in US also has its own power to enact laws that would enable it to deliver. This laws may be contrary to the federal laws.
Answer:
The answer is B) a lower chance of reelection.
Can I have Brainliest now?
