<span>In Chapter 7 bankruptcy, liquidation, the trustee sells off the debtor's assets and pays creditors. A Chapter 7 bankruptcy often turns into a Chapter 13 which is based around selling debt off to pay creditors. Selling off the assets and liquidating them gives them cash on hand to pay off what needs to be paid. </span>
Answer:
<u>cost to be accounted for:</u>
beginning cost: 180,000
added cost 756,000
total cost <em> 936,000</em>
<u>cost accounted for:</u>
ending WIP 30,000 x 5.2 = 156,000
trasnsferred-out: 150,000 x 5.2 = 780,000
total cost accounted for <em> 936,000</em>
Explanation:
150,000 completed
50,000 at 60%
weighted average equivalent unit:
complete + percetage of completion ending WIP
150,000 + 50,000 x 60% = 180,000
Cost per unit:
936,000 / 180,000 = 5.2 dollar per unit
we should match the total cost pool with the ending WIP and trasnferred out units
Answer:
The divided for common stockholders is $152000
Explanation:
The preferred stock is cumulative whch means any arrears in preference dividend will be paid whenever the dividend is declared.
The amount of yearly preference dividends is = 12000 * 100 * 0.07 = 84000
Thus, when 320000 cash dividend is declared, 2 years ( current year and arrear year) preference dividend will be paid first and the remaining will be distributed among common stock holders.
The dividedn for common stockholders is 320000 - (84000 * 2) = $152000
Based on the information given regarding the mortgage, the true statement will be that each of their payments is for the same amount.
A fully amortized payment simply means a payment where the individual makes every payment according to the schedule of the loan.
A fully amortized payment is a periodic repayment of a debt. Since Karen and Al obtained a 30-year fixed-rate fully amortized loan when they purchased their home, they'll pay the same amount monthly.
Learn more about mortgage on:
brainly.com/question/1318711
Answer:
Legal but Unethical
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Gander's business conduct is Legal but Unethical. It is legal because since it is a developing country there is most likely no law against the amount that the company's must pay employees. On the other hand it is unethical because the company is taking advantage of the necessity of the workers and is paying them nonliving wages.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
