The following statements are the key ideas from the article about Barry Bonds:
<u>- No players were chosen for the Baseball Hall of Fame in 2013.</u>
- People disagree about whether baseball players accused of using
<u>performance-enhancing drugs should join the Hall of Fame.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The given article discusses about the drug allegation in Major League Baseball and the accusation against the athletes.
The players who are suspected for consumption of the drugs were not chosen for the Hall of Fame. The voters were not able to select the players suspected of doping. The disagreement by the people for the doping issue is supported by the author.
The article mentions that some of the drugs have medical uses. But this was not the key idea of the article. It is shown that the athletes have used the drugs without prescriptions which are illegal.
Answer:
4. Tear down the wall and get closer to his neighbor.
Explanation:
The speaker feels that building walls is unnecessary and unnatural, and he wants to tear it down and get closer to his neighbor.
Asteroids offer a source of volatiles and an extraordinarily rich supply of minerals that can be exploited for the exploration and colonization of our solar system in the twenty-first century. Asteroids represent the bits and pieces left over from the process that formed the inner planets, including Earth.
Answer:
1. C
2: A
3: B
4:D
5: A
6: C
7: B
8: D
Are you taking the Other worlds: Unit 1 introduction Online practice" then here are the answers.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Fallacy can be defined as a mistaken or false belief that are based on illogical arguments or reasoning.
However, a lot of people might actually think it to true but it isn't. There are various types of fallacy, these include; black or white, non sequitur, ad hominem, bandwagon, appeal to authority, straw man, and oversimplification or hasty generalization.
Given the following statement of fallacy;
"The last two mass murderers were from Michigan. Obviously, people from Michigan are dangerous."
Thus, this is Hasty Generalization Fallacy because it isn't logically justified by enough empirical evidence.
Hasty generalization is a type of fallacy that involves making a claim or reaching a conclusion based on very little evidence or instances of an event.
