Explanation:
The reason is because secondary is higher than primary
<span> A. Blaming someone else for social problems
</span>
Answer:
¿Puedes ponerlo en español?
Explanation:
The Social Cognitive Theory of Personality states that personality of a person is developed by the social factors that person interacts to, cognitive factors, and behavior of the person.
<h3>
Social cognitive theory</h3>
- The social cognitive theory was developed by Albert Bandura as an interpersonal theory connecting behavior , personal factors and environment though reciprocal determinism.
- This theory is also known as social learning theory because in it we learn the behavior by observing social groups.
Therefore, Albert Bandura’s theory, originally called social learning theory, is now referred to as <u>social cognitive theory</u>, and it suggests cognitive processes play a role in influencing one’s personality.
Learn more about social cognitive theory here:
brainly.com/question/7274615
Answer:
Inductive
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning creates wide conclusions from certain observations, just as in this case study, the rate of murder. Majorly, there is data (in our case study- This pattern holds true, even when she controls for population differences (so it is not due to more people living in northern cities)), then generalizations are made from the data (from our case study--greater "culture of violence" in the south produces higher murder rates). This is often referred to as inductive logic, according to Utah State University.
"In inductive inference, there is a shift from an actual one to general form. We make many notations, create a pattern, make a conclusion, and create an explanation or a theory," Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. "In science, there is a constant interconnection among inductive inference (based on notations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we arrive in proximity to the 'truth,' by not just approaching but to be able to prove with total certainty."
Another instance of inductive logic is, "when a person pulls out a coin from a bag and it happened to be a penny. On reaching out the second time, the person also picked a penny, and at the third time, a third coin from the bag is also a penny. It will bring the person to make a generalization that all the coins in the bag are pennies."
Even if the entire premises are correct in a statement, inductive reasoning permits for the generalization to be false. Another example "Semai is a grandmother. Semai is bald. Therefore, all grandmothers are bald." The generalization does not comply logically from the statements.
